The worst one is still Nathanos, he's so arrogant and mistreats Baine! How dares he
Sylvanas has +5 Armor of Victimhood I see...Also, Hordefriends, Saurfang for Warchief.
On who started the war, what about all of Stormheim with an Alliance leader, and advisor to the king, taking direct action to attack the Horde Warchief? (There is the retreat on our side at the Broken Shores, but not directly engaging the alliance in battle, and if the full picture was known to both sides, the attack had already failed, And it would have been stalling the inevitable to hold the line)
Would have been so epic to blow the brain out of all the Alliance leaders with that blight bomb.......but plotarmor I guess.Her objective is to get rid of the Alliance or atleast make them cower in fear at the thought of attacking Horde ever again which is what I like about her. Also , hypocrites that call her evil , "ends excuses the means" is the same method used by Illidan yet you love Illidan.Actually , if I think about it , Illidan did much worse things than Sylvanas ever did or Garrosh ever did.Yet you like him......I laugh everytime I see someone comment on Sylvanas and her methods.I was hoping , in this scenario , someone of the Alliance leaders to die.....too bad it didnt happen.Anyway , if she goes down I hope he takes Anduin or Alleria with her it will give me alot of satisfaction seeing Alliance suffer.I dont like Sylvanas but you , all of you that call her evil or Garrosh v2.You are , without a doubt , the biggest hypocrites I've seen in my life and I've seen alot of them.Moral in a war? There is nothing moral about war.War is just a mass slaughter because 1 factions have an agenda that the other disagree.Now , just shut up and enjoy the conflict as we feed the Old Gods with our conflict.
I really hope there are some plot twists coming. So far Horde is having a second Garrosh and is portrayed as a bad guy nation yet again. Lame!
nathanos coat is so cool, i hope we get an undead allied race with a gear like his as heritage
I prefer the tone of Anduin's dialog in the leaked cinematic w/ Saurfang, tbh. It lacks the blunt bravado in a few of these new lines, which just don't suit him. I hope they haven't brought the cinematic in line w/ the tone here.
The Alliance started the war back in Stormheim attacking the warchief unprovoked shortly after their forces fought together on the broken shore. So Sylvanas responds in taking extreme measures to win the war the blue guys started. It is really simple. Win the war and the horde will be save alone on Kalimdor for centuries. I can get behind that idea.
I get Blizzard doesn't want Sylvanas to be a villain. I guess they want them to be a ruthless leader with non-existent moral compass. I know they repeat the same answer when people ask.... But if that is the idea of showcasing Sylvanas that way, they need to sack more than a few of their writers, because, that's one hell of a poor job.
If the Alliance knew that the best way to fight the Forsaken in Gilneas was to use exclusively Non-Human (/Vrykul Descended) troops that Sylvanas couldn't raise, why have they suddenly forgotten it now? I'm sure the collective might of, say, Ironforge, Shadowforge and Aerie Peak combined could have mustered a strong enough force to serve as the front lines - Why use a majority human army? It's more effort to get them up north anyway (Given that the Dwarves are, you know, based in Lordaeron).